[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: Introduce suspend states supported properties

On 12/09/18 12:19, Keerthy wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 September 2018 04:32 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 12/09/18 05:09, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Introuduce linux generic suspend states supported properties.
>>> It is convenient for the generic suspend path to have
>>> the knowledge of the suspend states supported based on the
>>> device tree properties based on which it can either be suspended
>>> or safely bailed out of suspend if none of the suspend states
>>> are supported.
>> NACK for any bindings that are linux specific. The suspend feature is so
>> platform dependent that I see no need for generic Linux bindings for the
>> same.
> suspend to mem and suspend to disk are pretty generic states and i agree
> implementation is platform dependent so why not have properties that
> convey if they are supported?

We already have power domains and idle states for that. If you need to
restrict few states on some platform for whatever reasons, just disable
those states. I don't see the need to add any more bindings for the same.

> Is the disagreement over making the properties being linux specific?



 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-12 13:38    [W:0.049 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site