Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:55:19 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active |
| |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 01:07:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > If the host TSCs are unsynchronized then yes, that's what happens. And > you can do live migration from synchronized to unsynchronized.
Which brings us back to my original question: why would we *ever* want to support unsynchronized TSCs in a guest? Such machines are a real abomination for baremetal - it doesn't make *any* sense to me to have that in guests too, if it can be helped...
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) --
| |