lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 01:07:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If the host TSCs are unsynchronized then yes, that's what happens. And
> you can do live migration from synchronized to unsynchronized.

Which brings us back to my original question: why would we *ever* want
to support unsynchronized TSCs in a guest? Such machines are a real
abomination for baremetal - it doesn't make *any* sense to me to have
that in guests too, if it can be helped...

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-11 15:56    [W:0.167 / U:1.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site