lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pci: dwc: pcie_designware: Fix a sleep-in-atomic-context bug in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu
From
Date


On 2018/9/11 16:40, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Hi Jia,
>
> On 02/09/2018 04:38, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> The driver may sleep with holding a spinlock and in an interupt handler.
>>
>> The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
>>
>> [FUNC] usleep_range
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c, 181:
>> usleep_range in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 479:
>> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu in dw_pcie_rd_other_conf
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 561:
>> dw_pcie_rd_other_conf in dw_pcie_rd_conf
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 66:
>> [FUNC_PTR]dw_pcie_rd_conf in pci_bus_read_config_word
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 918:
>> pci_bus_read_config_word in pci_read_config_word
>> drivers/block/umem.c, 630:
>> pci_read_config_word in mm_interrupt (interrupt handler)
>>
>> [FUNC] usleep_range
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c, 181:
>> usleep_range in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 479:
>> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu in dw_pcie_rd_other_conf
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 561:
>> dw_pcie_rd_other_conf in dw_pcie_rd_conf
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 66:
>> [FUNC_PTR]dw_pcie_rd_conf in pci_bus_read_config_word
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 918:
>> pci_bus_read_config_word in pci_read_config_word
>> drivers/ata/pata_efar.c, 115:
>> pci_read_config_word in efar_set_piomode
>> drivers/ata/pata_efar.c, 113:
>> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave in efar_set_piomod
>>
>> [FUNC] usleep_range
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c, 181:
>> usleep_range in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 479:
>> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu in dw_pcie_rd_other_conf
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 561:
>> dw_pcie_rd_other_conf in dw_pcie_rd_conf
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 66:
>> [FUNC_PTR]dw_pcie_rd_conf in pci_bus_read_config_word
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 918:
>> pci_bus_read_config_word in pci_read_config_word
>> drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c, 158:
>> pci_read_config_word in mtip_check_surprise_removal
>> drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c, 843:
>> mtip_check_surprise_removal in mtip_handle_irq
>> drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c, 879:
>> mtip_handle_irq in mtip_irq_handler (interrupt handler)
>>
>> [FUNC] usleep_range
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c, 181:
>> usleep_range in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 479:
>> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu in dw_pcie_rd_other_conf
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 561:
>> dw_pcie_rd_other_conf in dw_pcie_rd_conf
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 66:
>> [FUNC_PTR]dw_pcie_rd_conf in pci_bus_read_config_word
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 918:
>> pci_bus_read_config_word in pci_read_config_word
>> drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c, 645:
>> pci_read_config_word in vga_arbiter_add_pci_device
>> drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c, 629:
>> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave in vga_arbiter_add_pci_device
>>
>> [FUNC] usleep_range
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c, 181:
>> usleep_range in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 479:
>> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu in dw_pcie_rd_other_conf
>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c, 561:
>> dw_pcie_rd_other_conf in dw_pcie_rd_conf
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 66:
>> [FUNC_PTR]dw_pcie_rd_conf in pci_bus_read_config_word
>> drivers/pci/access.c, 918:
>> pci_bus_read_config_word in pci_read_config_word
>> drivers/pci/ats.c, 139:
>> pci_read_config_word in pci_ats_queue_depth
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c, 1519:
>> pci_ats_queue_depth in iommu_enable_dev_iotlb
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c, 5295:
>> iommu_enable_dev_iotlb in intel_iommu_enable_pasid
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c, 5241:
>> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave in intel_iommu_enable_pasid
>>
>> To fix this bug, usleep_range() is replaced with udelay().
>>
>> This bug is found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index 778c4f76a884..7f50f7e51543 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index,
>> if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE)
>> return;
>>
>> - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX);
>> + udelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX);
> You might use the mdelay instead of udelay, however this fix and others were
> already made on patch on [1]
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/10/284
>

Okay, that is good.


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-11 13:20    [W:0.056 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site