[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] fs: Don't need to put list_lru into its own cacheline
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 03:18:24PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> The list_lru structure is essentially just a pointer to a table of
> per-node LRU lists. Even if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is defined, the list
> field is just used for LRU list registration and shrinker_id is set
> at initialization. Those fields won't need to be touched that often.
> So there is no point to make the list_lru structures to sit in their
> own cachelines.
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <>

Looks fine.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <>
Dave Chinner

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-12 00:03    [W:0.071 / U:2.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site