Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:11:43 -0700 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver |
| |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:07:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Considering above, it is better to have a distinct irqchip and > > irq_domain for all local interrupts (just like this patch). > > If that's the future usage
It's not, at least there has been no proposal for that so far, and I don't really think it is how the architecture was intended.
> and that's what my impression was, under which I > changed my mind, yes, then having a domain model is certainly of advantage > especially when those things end up being different per SoC.
And even if we went down the way of using the other bits it would be architectureal in the RISC-V spec - these are not available for vendor specific uses.
| |