Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:09:10 +0300 | From | Ville Syrjälä <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/tsc: Consolidate init code" |
| |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:47:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:07:10PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > You're reading way too much into this. The revert is just a point to > > start the conversion. I've found that it's the best way to get the > > attention of the relevant developers. Other kind of regression > > reports have an unfortunate habit of disappearing into /dev/null. > > That's some strange "logic". > > You're sending a patch which has "[PATCH]" in the subject but now you > say it is not really a patch but only a way to get people's attention?!?
But it is a patch, and if it happens to get accepted as is so be it. If not, it's a good place where to start the conversation on how to fix the bug in another way.
You guys seem to have a notion that anything which says '[PATCH]' is somehow final. In my book any patch is up for debate. Nothing special about this one in that regard.
-- Ville Syrjälä Intel
| |