lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/10] phy: Add MIPI D-PHY configuration options
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 05:50:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Friday, 7 September 2018 11:56:23 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> The current set of parameters should cover all the potential users.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> include/linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >> include/linux/phy/phy.h | 6 +-
> > >> 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
> > >> create mode 100644 include/linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h
> > >> b/include/linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h new file mode 100644
> > >> index 000000000000..792724145290
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
> > >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > >> +/*
> > >> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Cadence Design Systems Inc.
> > >> + */
> > >> +
> > >> +#ifndef __PHY_MIPI_DPHY_H_
> > >> +#define __PHY_MIPI_DPHY_H_
> > >> +
> > >> +#include <video/videomode.h>
> > >> +
> > >> +/**
> > >> + * struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy - MIPI D-PHY configuration set
> > >> + *
> > >> + * This structure is used to represent the configuration state of a
> > >> + * MIPI D-PHY phy.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we split the RX and TX parameters in two structures ?
> >
> > Are they different? As far as I understood it, both were having the
> > same parameters.
>
> clk_miss, for instance, is a receiver parameter, while clk_post is a
> transmitter parameter. There are relationships between the transmitter and
> receiver parameters in the sense that they have to be compatible, and we may
> want to compute one set of parameters based on the other one, but I think they
> target RX and TX separately.

That would require however to have to fill a structure in the consumer
whose sole purpose would be to validate things in the phy
framework. That looks quite weird from an API point-of-view.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-10 16:19    [W:0.102 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site