Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:02 -0700 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver |
| |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:37:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Processor local interrupts really should be architected and there are > really not that many of them.
And that is what they are.
> But well, RISC-V decided obvsiouly not to learn from mistakes made by > others.
I don't think that is the case. I think Atup misreads what reserved means - if you look at section 2.3 of the RISC-V privileged spec it clearly states that reserved fields are for future use and not for vendor specific use.
| |