lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] Compiler Attributes: use feature checks instead of version checks
Hi Greg,

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Nick Desaulniers
>> <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>> > Overall, pretty happy with this patch. Still some thoughts for a v3,
>> >> -#define __visible __attribute__((externally_visible))
>> >> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 000000000000..a9dfafc8fd19
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
>> >
>> > New file needs an SPDX license identifier right?
>>
>> Yeah, but I wasn't sure of adding it, since the code I moved (even if
>> rearranged) from _types.h does not have it either. Any legal expert
>> here? Is _types.h it implicitly GPL 2? We should add the identifier to
>> both if so.
>
> It looks like we missed that file in the big "properly add SPDX
> identifiers to all files without a license" commit as it came in from a
> different tree.
>
> But yes, it is GPLv2 only implicitly, so you can add that. I should
> sweep the tree again to see if anything else has been added accidentally
> with that same problem.
>

Thanks Greg! Will do for v3.

Cheers,
Miguel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-01 21:16    [W:0.040 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site