Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:09:32 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion |
| |
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 06:15:25 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER, > > > which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the > > > arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc. > > > GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port. I > > > managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result > > > my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER > > > was dropped. > > > > > > This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm, > > > arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support > > > and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete. > > > > > > At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but > > > went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm, > > > arm64, and openrisc defconfigs. > > > > > > Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times > > > before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top > > > of what was merged. > > > > I'll take the whole pile through tip irq/core which probably makes the most > > sense unless there are any objections from architecture maintainers. > > Thanks! Unless I've managed to screw something up I don't see these in your > tree, but I also don't see any feedback from anyone else.
Yeah, I somehow managed to lose track of them. Picking them up now.
| |