Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:54:05 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/dcache: Make negative dentries easier to be reclaimed |
| |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:01:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Another pet peeve ;) > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:19:40 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote: > > > /** > > + * list_lru_add_head: add an element to the lru list's head > > + * @list_lru: the lru pointer > > + * @item: the item to be added. > > + * > > + * This is similar to list_lru_add(). The only difference is the location > > + * where the new item will be added. The list_lru_add() function will add > > People often use the term "the foo() function". I don't know why - > just say "foo()"!
For whatever it is worth...
I tend to use "The foo() function ..." instead of "foo() ..." in order to properly capitalize the first word of the sentence. So I might say "The call_rcu() function enqueues an RCU callback." rather than something like "call_rcu() enqueues an RCU callback." Or I might use some other trick to keep "call_rcu()" from being the first word of the sentence. But if the end of the previous sentence introduced call_rcu(), you usually want the next sentence's first use of "call_rcu()" to be very early in the sentence, because otherwise the flow will seem choppy.
And no, I have no idea what I would do if I were writing in German, where nouns are capitalized, given that function names tend to be used as nouns. Probably I would get yelled at a lot for capitalizing my function names. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
| |