lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] scsi: ufs: Add UFS platform driver for Cadence UFS
From
Date
On Thursday 09 August 2018 06:55 PM, Janek Kotas wrote:
> This patch adds a device tree platform driver for
> Cadence UFS Host Controller.
> It can be enabled with SCSI_UFS_CDNS_PLATFORM Kconfig option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..5d9e4875
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Platform UFS Host driver for Cadence controller
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com>
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/time.h>
> +
> +#include "ufshcd-pltfrm.h"
> +
> +#define CDNS_UFS_REG_HCLKDIV 0xFC
> +
> +/**
> + * Sets HCLKDIV register value based on the core_clk
> + * @hba: host controller instance
> + *
> + * Return zero for success and non-zero for failure
> + */
> +static int cdns_ufs_set_hclkdiv(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + struct ufs_clk_info *clki;
> + struct list_head *head = &hba->clk_list_head;
> + unsigned long core_clk_rate = 0;
> + u32 core_clk_div = 0;
> +
> + if (list_empty(head))
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(clki, head, list) {
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clki->clk))
> + continue;
> + if (!strcmp(clki->name, "core_clk"))
> + core_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(clki->clk);
> + }
> +
> + if (!core_clk_rate) {
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: unable to find core_clk rate\n",
> + __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + core_clk_div = core_clk_rate / USEC_PER_SEC;
> +
> + ufshcd_writel(hba, core_clk_div, CDNS_UFS_REG_HCLKDIV);
> + /* Make sure the register was updated */
> + mb();

Why is it critical to ensure write completed here?

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +

> +/**
> + * cdns_ufs_pltfrm_remove - set driver_data of the device to NULL

This appear to do more than setting driver_data to NULL.

> + * @pdev: pointer to platform device handle
> + *
> + * Always returns 0
> + */
> +static int cdns_ufs_pltfrm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct ufs_hba *hba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);

This looks suspect. Why do you need this get_sync() on remove() and
where is the corresponding put_sync()?

> + ufshcd_remove(hba);
> + return 0;
> +}

Thanks,
Sekhar

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-29 12:29    [W:0.564 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site