lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Tagged pointers in the XArray
From
Date
On 08/28/2018 04:03 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:39:01PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Just a question, please...
>>
>> On 08/28/2018 03:27 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
>>> index c74556ea4258..d1b383f3063f 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/xarray.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
>>> @@ -150,6 +150,54 @@ static inline int xa_err(void *entry)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * xa_tag_pointer() - Create an XArray entry for a tagged pointer.
>>> + * @p: Plain pointer.
>>> + * @tag: Tag value (0, 1 or 3).
>>> + *
>>
>> What's wrong with a tag value of 2?
>
> That conflicts with the XArray's internal entries and you get a WARN_ON
> when you try to store it in the array.
>
>> and what happens when one is used? [I don't see anything preventing that.]
>
> Right, there's nothing preventing you from using the value 5 or 19
> or 16777216 either ... I did put in a WARN_ON_ONCE to begin with, but
> decided that was unnecessary.
>
> Right now our only user uses 0 and 1, so even documenting 3 as a
> possibility isn't _necessary_, but some day somebody is going to want
> to add FILE_NOT_FOUND
> https://thedailywtf.com/articles/What_Is_Truth_0x3f_
>

Thanks. :)

--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-29 01:10    [W:0.085 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site