Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:45:06 -0500 | From | Kim Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update |
| |
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200 Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files. > > Tested, no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know.
Thanks! An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of emails in the future. I doubt your official Tested-by implies you necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp. if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above.
BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing.
Again, thanks for testing!
Kim
| |