lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] drivers: edac: Add EDAC driver support for QCOM SoCs
On 2018-08-24 09:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2018-08-17 17:08:34)
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Kconfig b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> index 57304b2..da8f150 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
>> @@ -460,4 +460,32 @@ config EDAC_TI
>> Support for error detection and correction on the
>> TI SoCs.
>>
>> +config EDAC_QCOM
>> + tristate "QCOM EDAC Controller"
>> + depends on EDAC
>> + help
>> + Support for error detection and correction on the
>> + QCOM SoCs.
>> +
>> +config EDAC_QCOM_LLCC
>> + tristate "QCOM EDAC Controller for LLCC Cache"
>> + depends on EDAC_QCOM && QCOM_LLCC
>> + help
>> + Support for error detection and correction on the
>> + QCOM LLCC cache. Report errors caught by LLCC ECC
>> + mechanism.
>> +
>> + For debugging issues having to do with stability and overall
>> system
>> + health, you should probably say 'Y' here.
>> +
>> +config EDAC_QCOM_LLCC_PANIC_ON_UE
>> + bool "Panic on uncorrectable errors - qcom llcc"
>
> Why isn't this a generic option for all EDAC?

I'm not sure, I'll get back to you on this.

>
>> + depends on EDAC_QCOM_LLCC
>> + help
>> + Forcibly cause a kernel panic if an uncorrectable error (UE)
>> is
>> + detected. This can reduce debugging times on hardware which
>> may be
>> + operating at voltages or frequencies outside normal
>> specification.
>> +
>> + For production builds, you should probably say 'N' here.
>> +
>> endif # EDAC
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Makefile b/drivers/edac/Makefile
>> index 02b43a7..716096d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/Makefile
>> @@ -77,3 +77,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA) +=
>> altera_edac.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_SYNOPSYS) += synopsys_edac.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_XGENE) += xgene_edac.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_TI) += ti_edac.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_QCOM) += qcom_edac.o
>
> Maybe put this in sort of alphabetical order so conflicts don't happen.

None of them are in alphabetical order, so I'm not sure where to start!
what do you suggest?

>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..9a8c670
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,446 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/edac.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>
> Used? Maybe it should just be linux/of.h
Ok, I'll check and update.

>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/smp.h>
>
> Why?
I'll check if this is being used, otherwise, I'll remove it.

>
>> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h>
>> +
>> +#include "edac_mc.h"
>> +#include "edac_device.h"
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_QCOM_LLCC_PANIC_ON_UE
>> +#define LLCC_ERP_PANIC_ON_UE 1
>> +#else
>> +#define LLCC_ERP_PANIC_ON_UE 0
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#define EDAC_LLCC "qcom_llcc"
>> +
>> +#define TRP_SYN_REG_CNT 6
>> +
>> +#define DRP_SYN_REG_CNT 8
>> +
>> +#define LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0 0x0003000C
>> +#define LLCC_LB_CNT_MASK GENMASK(31, 28)
>> +#define LLCC_LB_CNT_SHIFT 28
>> +
>> +/* single & Double Bit syndrome register offsets */
>> +#define TRP_ECC_SB_ERR_SYN0 0x0002304C
>> +#define TRP_ECC_DB_ERR_SYN0 0x00020370
>> +#define DRP_ECC_SB_ERR_SYN0 0x0004204C
>> +#define DRP_ECC_DB_ERR_SYN0 0x00042070
>> +
>> +/* Error register offsets */
>> +#define TRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS1 0x00020348
>> +#define TRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS0 0x00020344
>> +#define DRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS1 0x00042048
>> +#define DRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS0 0x00042044
>> +
>> +/* TRP, DRP interrupt register offsets */
>> +#define DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS 0x00041000
>> +#define TRP_INTERRUPT_0_STATUS 0x00020480
>> +#define DRP_INTERRUPT_CLEAR 0x00041008
>> +#define DRP_ECC_ERROR_CNTR_CLEAR 0x00040004
>> +#define TRP_INTERRUPT_0_CLEAR 0x00020484
>> +#define TRP_ECC_ERROR_CNTR_CLEAR 0x00020440
>> +
>> +/* Mask and shift macros */
>> +#define ECC_DB_ERR_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
>> +#define ECC_DB_ERR_WAYS_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
>> +#define ECC_DB_ERR_WAYS_SHIFT BIT(4)
>> +
>> +#define ECC_SB_ERR_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
>> +#define ECC_SB_ERR_COUNT_SHIFT BIT(4)
>> +#define ECC_SB_ERR_WAYS_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
>> +
>> +#define SB_ECC_ERROR BIT(0)
>> +#define DB_ECC_ERROR BIT(1)
>> +
>> +#define DRP_TRP_INT_CLEAR GENMASK(1, 0)
>> +#define DRP_TRP_CNT_CLEAR GENMASK(1, 0)
>> +
>> +/* Config registers offsets*/
>> +#define DRP_ECC_ERROR_CFG 0x00040000
>> +
>> +/* TRP, DRP interrupt register offsets */
>> +#define CMN_INTERRUPT_0_ENABLE 0x0003001C
>> +#define CMN_INTERRUPT_2_ENABLE 0x0003003C
>> +#define TRP_INTERRUPT_0_ENABLE 0x00020488
>> +#define DRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE 0x0004100C
>> +
>> +#define SB_ERROR_THRESHOLD 0x1
>> +#define SB_ERROR_THRESHOLD_SHIFT 24
>> +#define SB_DB_TRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE 0x3
>> +#define TRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE 0x1
>> +#define DRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE BIT(6)
>> +#define SB_DB_DRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE 0x3
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + LLCC_DRAM_CE = 0,
>> + LLCC_DRAM_UE,
>> + LLCC_TRAM_CE,
>> + LLCC_TRAM_UE,
>> + LLCC_ERR_TYPE_MAX = LLCC_TRAM_UE + 1,
>
> What's the point?

I was using this to have a sentinel value for this enum, which can be
used
initially to allocate the memory and later for any kind of error checks.

I'll remove this as we are anyway getting rid of this allocation and I'm
not doing any error checks for now.

>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int qcom_llcc_core_setup(struct regmap *llcc_bcast_regmap)
>> +{
>> + u32 sb_err_threshold;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Enable TRP in instance 2 of common interrupt enable
>> register */
>
> What is TRP?

This is in reference to Tag Ram, I'll expand this one.

>
>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(llcc_bcast_regmap,
>> CMN_INTERRUPT_2_ENABLE,
>> + TRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE,
>> + TRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Enable ECC interrupts on Tag Ram */
>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(llcc_bcast_regmap,
>> TRP_INTERRUPT_0_ENABLE,
>> + SB_DB_TRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE,
>> + SB_DB_TRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Enable SB error for Data RAM */
>
> SB is single bit?

Yes, Single bit, I'll expand this one.

>
>> + sb_err_threshold = (SB_ERROR_THRESHOLD <<
>> SB_ERROR_THRESHOLD_SHIFT);
>> + ret = regmap_write(llcc_bcast_regmap, DRP_ECC_ERROR_CFG,
>> + sb_err_threshold);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Enable DRP in instance 2 of common interrupt enable
>> register */
>
> DRP is double bit?

No, This is in reference to Data Ram, May be I should expand this one
too.

>
>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(llcc_bcast_regmap,
>> CMN_INTERRUPT_2_ENABLE,
>> + DRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE,
>> + DRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Enable ECC interrupts on Data Ram */
>> + ret = regmap_write(llcc_bcast_regmap, DRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE,
>> + SB_DB_DRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Clear the error interrupt and counter registers */
>> +static int
>> +qcom_llcc_clear_errors_status(int err_type, struct llcc_drv_data
>> *drv)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + switch (err_type) {
>> + case LLCC_DRAM_CE:
>> + case LLCC_DRAM_UE:
>> + /* Clear the interrupt */
>> + ret = regmap_write(drv->bcast_regmap,
>> DRP_INTERRUPT_CLEAR,
>> + DRP_TRP_INT_CLEAR);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Clear the counters */
>
> A lot of these comments are just saying what the register write is
> doing
> which is fairly obvious from the register names. Can you remove these
> obvious comments?

Ok, Done. I'll update this in the next patchset.

>
>> + ret = regmap_write(drv->bcast_regmap,
>> DRP_ECC_ERROR_CNTR_CLEAR,
>> + DRP_TRP_CNT_CLEAR);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + case LLCC_TRAM_CE:
>> + case LLCC_TRAM_UE:
>> + ret = regmap_write(drv->bcast_regmap,
>> TRP_INTERRUPT_0_CLEAR,
>> + DRP_TRP_INT_CLEAR);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_write(drv->bcast_regmap,
>> TRP_ECC_ERROR_CNTR_CLEAR,
>> + DRP_TRP_CNT_CLEAR);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Dump Syndrome registers data for Tag RAM, Data RAM bit errors*/
>> +static int
>> +dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int
>> err_type)
>> +{
>> + struct llcc_edac_reg_data *reg_data =
>> &(drv->edac_reg[err_type]);
>
> const? Also, drop the useless parenthesis.

Ok, done.

>
>> + int err_cnt, err_ways, ret, i;
>> + u32 synd_reg, synd_val;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < reg_data->reg_cnt; i++) {
>> + synd_reg = reg_data->synd_reg + (i * 4);
>> + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap, drv->offsets[bank] +
>> synd_reg,
>> + &synd_val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto clear;
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: ECC_SYN%d:
>> 0x%8x\n",
>> + reg_data->err_name, i, synd_val);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
>> + drv->offsets[bank] +
>> reg_data->err_status_reg,
>> + &err_cnt);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto clear;
>> +
>> + err_cnt &= reg_data->err_count_mask;
>> + err_cnt >>= reg_data->err_count_shift;
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: error count: 0x%4x\n",
>> + reg_data->err_name, err_cnt);
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
>> + drv->offsets[bank] +
>> reg_data->err_ways_status,
>> + &err_ways);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto clear;
>> +
>> + err_ways &= reg_data->err_ways_mask;
>> + err_ways >>= reg_data->err_ways_shift;
>> +
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: error ways: 0x%4x\n",
>> + reg_data->err_name, err_ways);
>> +
>> +clear:
>> + ret = qcom_llcc_clear_errors_status(err_type, drv);
>> + return ret;
>
> Just 'return qcom_llcc_clear_errors_status(...)'

Done.

>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dump_syn_reg(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl, int err_type, u32
>> bank)
>> +{
>> + struct llcc_drv_data *drv = edev_ctl->pvt_info;
>> + int ret = 0;
>
> Please don't assign local variables at the start of a function and then
> reassign them again immediately after. It hides initialization
> problems.

I did this because the compiler was throwing some warnings, I'll try to
get that
and see if this is really needed.

>
>> +
>> + ret = dump_syn_reg_values(drv, bank, err_type);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + switch (err_type) {
>> + case LLCC_DRAM_CE:
>> + edac_device_handle_ce(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
>> + "LLCC Data RAM correctable
>> Error");
>> + break;
>> + case LLCC_DRAM_UE:
>> + edac_device_handle_ue(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
>> + "LLCC Data RAM uncorrectable
>> Error");
>> + break;
>> + case LLCC_TRAM_CE:
>> + edac_device_handle_ce(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
>> + "LLCC Tag RAM correctable
>> Error");
>> + break;
>> + case LLCC_TRAM_UE:
>> + edac_device_handle_ue(edev_ctl, 0, bank,
>> + "LLCC Tag RAM uncorrectable
>> Error");
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t
>> +llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
>> +{
>> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev_ctl;
>> + irqreturn_t irq_rc = IRQ_NONE;
>> + u32 drp_error, trp_error, i;
>> + struct llcc_drv_data *drv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + edac_dev_ctl = (struct edac_device_ctl_info *)edev_ctl;
>
> Remove useless cast please.

Forgot to update this, I'll do it.

>
>> + drv = edac_dev_ctl->pvt_info;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < drv->num_banks; i++) {
>> + /* Look for Data RAM errors */
>> + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
>> + drv->offsets[i] +
>> DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS,
>> + &drp_error);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return irq_rc;
>> +
>> + if (drp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR) {
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC,
>> + "Single Bit Error detected in Data
>> Ram\n");
>> + ret = dump_syn_reg(edev_ctl, LLCC_DRAM_CE, i);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> Rename 'irq_rc' to 'handled' and make it a bool and then break from all
> these 'return irq_rc' places and 'if (handled) return IRQ_HANDLED;
> return IRQ_NONE;' at the end of this function so we have one exit point
> from the irq handler.

Ok, I'll try to optimize the logic here.

>
>> + } else if (drp_error & DB_ECC_ERROR) {
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC,
>> + "Double Bit Error detected in Data
>> Ram\n");
>> + ret = dump_syn_reg(edev_ctl, LLCC_DRAM_UE, i);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Look for Tag RAM errors */
>> + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
>> + drv->offsets[i] +
>> TRP_INTERRUPT_0_STATUS,
>> + &trp_error);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return irq_rc;
>> +
>> + if (trp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR) {
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC,
>> + "Single Bit Error detected in Tag
>> Ram\n");
>> + ret = dump_syn_reg(edev_ctl, LLCC_TRAM_CE, i);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + } else if (trp_error & DB_ECC_ERROR) {
>> + edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC,
>> + "Double Bit Error detected in Tag
>> Ram\n");
>> + ret = dump_syn_reg(edev_ctl, LLCC_TRAM_UE, i);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return irq_rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void llcc_edac_reg_data_init(struct llcc_edac_reg_data
>> *edac_reg)
>> +{
>> +
>> + struct llcc_edac_reg_data *reg_data;
>> +
>> + /* Initialize register info for LLCC_DRAM_CE */
>> + reg_data = &edac_reg[LLCC_DRAM_CE];
>> + reg_data->err_name = "DRAM Single-bit";
>> + reg_data->reg_cnt = DRP_SYN_REG_CNT;
>> + reg_data->synd_reg = DRP_ECC_SB_ERR_SYN0;
>> + reg_data->err_status_reg = DRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS1;
>> + reg_data->err_count_mask = ECC_SB_ERR_COUNT_MASK;
>> + reg_data->err_count_shift = ECC_SB_ERR_COUNT_SHIFT;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_status = DRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS0;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_mask = ECC_SB_ERR_WAYS_MASK;
>> +
>> + /* Initialize register info for LLCC_DRAM_UE */
>> + reg_data = &edac_reg[LLCC_DRAM_UE];
>> + reg_data->err_name = "DRAM Double-bit";
>> + reg_data->reg_cnt = DRP_SYN_REG_CNT;
>> + reg_data->synd_reg = DRP_ECC_DB_ERR_SYN0;
>> + reg_data->err_status_reg = DRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS1;
>> + reg_data->err_count_mask = ECC_DB_ERR_COUNT_MASK;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_status = DRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS0;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_mask = ECC_DB_ERR_WAYS_MASK;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_shift = ECC_DB_ERR_WAYS_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + /* Initialize register info for LLCC_TRAM_CE */
>> + reg_data = &edac_reg[LLCC_TRAM_CE];
>> + reg_data->err_name = "TRAM Single-bit";
>> + reg_data->reg_cnt = TRP_SYN_REG_CNT;
>> + reg_data->synd_reg = TRP_ECC_SB_ERR_SYN0;
>> + reg_data->err_status_reg = TRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS1;
>> + reg_data->err_count_mask = ECC_SB_ERR_COUNT_MASK;
>> + reg_data->err_count_shift = ECC_SB_ERR_COUNT_SHIFT;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_status = TRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS0;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_mask = ECC_SB_ERR_WAYS_MASK;
>> +
>> + /* Initialize register info for LLCC_TRAM_UE */
>> + reg_data = &edac_reg[LLCC_TRAM_UE];
>> + reg_data->err_name = "TRAM Double-bit";
>> + reg_data->reg_cnt = TRP_SYN_REG_CNT;
>> + reg_data->synd_reg = TRP_ECC_DB_ERR_SYN0;
>> + reg_data->err_status_reg = TRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS1;
>> + reg_data->err_count_mask = ECC_DB_ERR_COUNT_MASK;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_status = TRP_ECC_ERROR_STATUS0;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_mask = ECC_DB_ERR_WAYS_MASK;
>> + reg_data->err_ways_shift = ECC_DB_ERR_WAYS_SHIFT;
>
> Why can't these things be a static const array that the driver looks up
> in? What's the point of it being per-device instance?

Yeah, we don't need this struct to be populated per device. That makes
sense.
I'll make this initialization static.

>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_llcc_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct llcc_drv_data *llcc_driv_data =
>> pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + int ecc_irq;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + /* Initialize register set for the error types*/
>> + llcc_driv_data->edac_reg = devm_kcalloc(dev,
>> LLCC_ERR_TYPE_MAX,
>> + sizeof(struct
>> llcc_edac_reg_data),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + llcc_edac_reg_data_init(llcc_driv_data->edac_reg);
>> +
>> + rc = qcom_llcc_core_setup(llcc_driv_data->bcast_regmap);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate edac control info */
>> + edev_ctl = edac_device_alloc_ctl_info(0, "qcom-llcc", 1,
>> "bank",
>> +
>> llcc_driv_data->num_banks, 1,
>> + NULL, 0,
>> +
>> edac_device_alloc_index());
>> +
>> + if (!edev_ctl)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + edev_ctl->dev = dev;
>> + edev_ctl->mod_name = dev_name(dev);
>> + edev_ctl->dev_name = dev_name(dev);
>> + edev_ctl->ctl_name = "llcc";
>> + edev_ctl->panic_on_ue = LLCC_ERP_PANIC_ON_UE;
>> + edev_ctl->pvt_info = llcc_driv_data;
>> +
>> + rc = edac_device_add_device(edev_ctl);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out_mem;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edev_ctl);
>> +
>> + /* Request for ecc irq */
>> + ecc_irq = llcc_driv_data->ecc_irq;
>> + if (ecc_irq < 0) {
>> + rc = -ENODEV;
>
> Return error code from platform_get_irq()? Oh, that's weird. Why is
> some/
> other driver getting and storing the irq away? Hopefully it isn't a
> shared IRQ.

No, it isn't a shared irq. LLCC EDAC platform driver is registered from
LLCC
and the interrupt values are populated there.
Check this patch [[PATCH v2 2/4] drivers: soc: Add support to register
LLCC EDAC driver]


>
>> + goto out_dev;
>> + }
>> + rc = devm_request_irq(dev, ecc_irq, llcc_ecc_irq_handler,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "llcc_ecc",
>> edev_ctl);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out_dev;
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> +out_dev:
>> + edac_device_del_device(edev_ctl->dev);
>> +out_mem:
>> + edac_device_free_ctl_info(edev_ctl);
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_llcc_edac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl =
>> dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + edac_device_del_device(edev_ctl->dev);
>> + edac_device_free_ctl_info(edev_ctl);
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> No need. Don't set platform data to NULL.

Why? I was asked to set this explicitly.
It'd be good to know why I don't need this. Is it taken care of by
framework explicitly?

>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_llcc_edac_match_table[] = {
>> +#ifdef EDAC_QCOM_LLCC
>
> Huh? Shouldn't this driver only be compiled when this config is
> enabled?

No this driver is a generic qcom edac driver, and the llcc-edac will
come into
picture only when this config is enabled.


We updated this as per the initial comments on to maintain this driver
generically

>
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,llcc-edac" },
>> +#endif
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver qcom_llcc_edac_driver = {
>> + .probe = qcom_llcc_edac_probe,
>> + .remove = qcom_llcc_edac_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "qcom_llcc_edac",
>> + .of_match_table = qcom_llcc_edac_match_table,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(qcom_llcc_edac_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM EDAC driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
>> b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
>> index 2e4b34d..25096e0 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct llcc_drv_data {
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> struct regmap *bcast_regmap;
>> const struct llcc_slice_config *cfg;
>> + struct llcc_edac_reg_data *edac_reg;
>
> Why a pointer instead of an array of proper size?

I wanted to have it dynamic, so that if you want to add more error types
you don't need to update this one.

Anyhow, I'm removing this one to make this struct initialization static.

>
>> struct mutex lock;
>> u32 cfg_size;
>> u32 max_slices;
>> @@ -93,6 +94,30 @@ struct llcc_drv_data {
>> int ecc_irq;
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * llcc_edac_reg_data - llcc edac registers data for each error type
>> + * @err_name: name of the error
>> + * @reg_cnt: number of registers
>> + * @synd_reg: syndrome register address
>> + * @err_status_reg: Status register address to read the error count
>> + * @err_count_mask: Mask value to get the error count
>> + * @err_count_shift: Shift value to get the error count
>> + * @err_ways_status: Status register address to read error ways
>> + * @err_ways_mask: Mask value to get the error ways
>> + * @err_ways_shift: Shift value to get the error ways
>> + */
>> +struct llcc_edac_reg_data {
>> + char *err_name;
>
> Just name instead?

I don't think "name" itself doesn't convey anything. I wanted to have
better convention, hence this variable.

>
>> + int reg_cnt;
>> + int synd_reg;
>> + int err_status_reg;
>> + int err_count_mask;
>> + int err_count_shift;
>> + int err_ways_status;
>> + int err_ways_mask;
>> + int err_ways_shift;
>
> Do any of these need to be signed types? Use u8 for register offsets
> and
> shifts, u32 for masks and unsigned ints for counts please.

Sure, that makes sense, I'll update the data types.

>
>> +};

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-24 21:49    [W:1.268 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site