Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockdep limitations/bugs | From | Johannes Berg <> | Date | Tue, 21 Aug 2018 19:15:55 +0200 |
| |
Hi Tejun,
> > Let's say we again have an ordered workqueue, and the following: > > > > work1_function > > { > > mutex_lock(&mutex); > > } > > Regular mutexes complain when the locker isn't the unlocker already. > Do we really care about this case?
Oh, sorry for the confusion. I was just eliding the - not very interesting for this case - unlock. Really I should've typed up a lock/unlock pair in all of the examples.
johannes
|  |