lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] compiler-gcc: get back Clang build
From
Date
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:32 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:38 AM Dominique Martinet
> <asmadeus@codewreck.org> wrote:
> >
> > Nick Desaulniers Aug. 21, 2018, 8:09 a.m. UTC:
> > > Thanks for noticing, and sending this patch. I'm happy to see others
> > > testing with Clang. I noticed this too near the end of the day
> > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/27.
> >
> > FWIW libbcc so many BPF users also use clang, so this has more impact
> > than just testing to build linux with clang (not that this would be any
> > reason to delay fixing either way)
> >
> > I would tend to agree havin a compiler-common + make clang/intel not
> > include compiler-gcc would probably be best in the long run but we might
> > want a quick fix for 4.19 meanwhile..
>
> That's fair. SOP here is quick (full) revert, then come up with a
> better fix. And I do prefer Masahiro's partial revert to a full
> revert of Joe's patch. That will give us more time to develop the
> proper fix rather than rush. I'll try to see how we can more properly
> split the compiler specific headers.
>
> Tested with gcc-7 and clang-8.

clang-8? Isn't the latest officlal clang 6.0.1 ?

http://releases.llvm.org/

vs

https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html

So if something other than 6.0.x is required,
then some additional check should probably be
added to compiler-clang.h as well.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-21 18:47    [W:0.210 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site