Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:00:39 -0700 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockdep limitations/bugs |
| |
Hello, Johannes.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 02:03:15PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > 3) > The third problem is more complicated, but it means that we likely miss a > lot of potential locking problems with ordered workqueues, and I think we > should really try to fix this somehow. > > Let's say we again have an ordered workqueue, and the following: > > work1_function > { > mutex_lock(&mutex); > }
Regular mutexes complain when the locker isn't the unlocker already. Do we really care about this case?
Thanks.
-- tejun
|  |