Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:42:43 +0200 | From | Cornelia Huck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: BUG correction by shadow_crycb |
| |
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:36:19 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 21.08.2018 16:33, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:19:38 +0200 > > Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> Copy the key mask to the right offset inside the shadow CRYCB > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> > >> --- > >> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 3 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c > >> index 63844b9..a2b28cd 100644 > >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c > >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c > >> @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page) > >> return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0039U); > >> > >> /* copy only the wrapping keys */ > >> - if (read_guest_real(vcpu, crycb_addr + 72, &vsie_page->crycb, 56)) > >> + if (read_guest_real(vcpu, crycb_addr + 72, > >> + vsie_page->crycb.dea_wrapping_key_mask, 56)) > > > > Don't you need the address here? > > As it is defined as an array, the address would result in the same value. > > (&vsie_page->crycb.dea_wrapping_key_mask[0])
/me looks...
Indeed, it just looks a bit odd.
With the changed subject
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > >> return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0035U); > >> > >> scb_s->ecb3 |= ecb3_flags; > > > >
|  |