lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH V2 2/2] blk-mq: sync the update nr_hw_queues with part_in_flight
Date
For blk-mq, part_in_flight/rw will invoke blk_mq_in_flight/rw to
account the inflight requests. It will access the queue_hw_ctx and
nr_hw_queues w/o any protection. When updating nr_hw_queues and
blk_mq_in_flight/rw occur concurrently, panic comes up.

Before update nr_hw_queues, the q will be frozen. So we could use
q_usage_counter to avoid the race. percpu_ref_is_zero is used here
so that we will not miss any in-flight request. And also both the
check and blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter are under rcu critical section,
then __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues could ensure the zeroed q_usage_counter
to be globally visible.

Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index de7027f..9ec98bd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -112,7 +112,22 @@ void blk_mq_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part,
struct mq_inflight mi = { .part = part, .inflight = inflight, };

inflight[0] = inflight[1] = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues will update the nr_hw_queues and
+ * queue_hw_ctx after freeze the queue. So we could use q_usage_counter
+ * to avoid race with it. __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues will use
+ * synchronize_rcu to ensure all of the users of blk_mq_in_flight
+ * go out of the critical section and see zeroed q_usage_counter.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->q_usage_counter)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return;
+ }
+
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(q, blk_mq_check_inflight, &mi);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}

static void blk_mq_check_inflight_rw(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
@@ -131,7 +146,18 @@ void blk_mq_in_flight_rw(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part,
struct mq_inflight mi = { .part = part, .inflight = inflight, };

inflight[0] = inflight[1] = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * See comment of blk_mq_in_flight.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->q_usage_counter)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return;
+ }
+
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(q, blk_mq_check_inflight_rw, &mi);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}

void blk_freeze_queue_start(struct request_queue *q)
@@ -2905,7 +2931,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,

list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
-
+ /*
+ * Sync with blk_mq_in_flight and blk_mq_in_flight_rw
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
/*
* switch io scheduler to NULL to clean up the data in it.
* will get it back after update mapping between cpu and hw queues.
--
2.7.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-17 05:54    [W:0.060 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site