lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 4.9 055/107] Revert "x86/apic: Ignore secondary threads if nosmt=force"
    Date
    4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

    ------------------

    From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

    commit 506a66f374891ff08e064a058c446b336c5ac760 upstream

    Dave Hansen reported, that it's outright dangerous to keep SMT siblings
    disabled completely so they are stuck in the BIOS and wait for SIPI.

    The reason is that Machine Check Exceptions are broadcasted to siblings and
    the soft disabled sibling has CR4.MCE = 0. If a MCE is delivered to a
    logical core with CR4.MCE = 0, it asserts IERR#, which shuts down or
    reboots the machine. The MCE chapter in the SDM contains the following
    blurb:

    Because the logical processors within a physical package are tightly
    coupled with respect to shared hardware resources, both logical
    processors are notified of machine check errors that occur within a
    given physical processor. If machine-check exceptions are enabled when
    a fatal error is reported, all the logical processors within a physical
    package are dispatched to the machine-check exception handler. If
    machine-check exceptions are disabled, the logical processors enter the
    shutdown state and assert the IERR# signal. When enabling machine-check
    exceptions, the MCE flag in control register CR4 should be set for each
    logical processor.

    Reverting the commit which ignores siblings at enumeration time solves only
    half of the problem. The core cpuhotplug logic needs to be adjusted as
    well.

    This thoughtful engineered mechanism also turns the boot process on all
    Intel HT enabled systems into a MCE lottery. MCE is enabled on the boot CPU
    before the secondary CPUs are brought up. Depending on the number of
    physical cores the window in which this situation can happen is smaller or
    larger. On a HSW-EX it's about 750ms:

    MCE is enabled on the boot CPU:

    [ 0.244017] mce: CPU supports 22 MCE banks

    The corresponding sibling #72 boots:

    [ 1.008005] .... node #0, CPUs: #72

    That means if an MCE hits on physical core 0 (logical CPUs 0 and 72)
    between these two points the machine is going to shutdown. At least it's a
    known safe state.

    It's obvious that the early boot can be hit by an MCE as well and then runs
    into the same situation because MCEs are not yet enabled on the boot CPU.
    But after enabling them on the boot CPU, it does not make any sense to
    prevent the kernel from recovering.

    Adjust the nosmt kernel parameter documentation as well.

    Reverts: 2207def700f9 ("x86/apic: Ignore secondary threads if nosmt=force")
    Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
    Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    ---
    Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++------
    arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 2 --
    arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 3 +--
    arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 19 -------------------
    4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

    --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
    +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
    @@ -2695,12 +2695,8 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
    Equivalent to smt=1.

    [KNL,x86] Disable symmetric multithreading (SMT).
    - nosmt=force: Force disable SMT, similar to disabling
    - it in the BIOS except that some of the
    - resource partitioning effects which are
    - caused by having SMT enabled in the BIOS
    - cannot be undone. Depending on the CPU
    - type this might have a performance impact.
    + nosmt=force: Force disable SMT, cannot be undone
    + via the sysfs control file.

    nospectre_v2 [X86] Disable all mitigations for the Spectre variant 2
    (indirect branch prediction) vulnerability. System may
    --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
    +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
    @@ -636,10 +636,8 @@ extern int default_check_phys_apicid_pre

    #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
    bool apic_id_is_primary_thread(unsigned int id);
    -bool apic_id_disabled(unsigned int id);
    #else
    static inline bool apic_id_is_primary_thread(unsigned int id) { return false; }
    -static inline bool apic_id_disabled(unsigned int id) { return false; }
    #endif

    extern void irq_enter(void);
    --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
    +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
    @@ -177,8 +177,7 @@ static int acpi_register_lapic(int id, u
    }

    if (!enabled) {
    - if (!apic_id_disabled(id))
    - ++disabled_cpus;
    + ++disabled_cpus;
    return -EINVAL;
    }

    --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
    +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
    @@ -2056,16 +2056,6 @@ bool apic_id_is_primary_thread(unsigned
    return !(apicid & mask);
    }

    -/**
    - * apic_id_disabled - Check whether APIC ID is disabled via SMT control
    - * @id: APIC ID to check
    - */
    -bool apic_id_disabled(unsigned int id)
    -{
    - return (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED &&
    - !apic_id_is_primary_thread(id));
    -}
    -
    /*
    * Should use this API to allocate logical CPU IDs to keep nr_logical_cpuids
    * and cpuid_to_apicid[] synchronized.
    @@ -2161,15 +2151,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, i
    return -EINVAL;
    }

    - /*
    - * If SMT is force disabled and the APIC ID belongs to
    - * a secondary thread, ignore it.
    - */
    - if (apic_id_disabled(apicid)) {
    - pr_info_once("Ignoring secondary SMT threads\n");
    - return -EINVAL;
    - }
    -
    if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
    /*
    * x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-08-14 19:51    [W:4.258 / U:1.380 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site