lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/crypto: Add missing RETs

* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Great, I'd be perfectly fine with such an approach.
> >
> > Also, if we have that then we could re-apply Alexey's patch and switch to INT3
> > (only on 64-bit kernels) without any trouble, because objtool should detect any
> > execution flow bugs before the INT3 could trigger, right?
> >
> > I.e. any INT3 fault would show a combination of *both* an objtool bug and a
> > probable code flow bug - which I suspect would warrant crashing the box ...
>
> Sounds good to me. I can take Alexey's patch and submit a 64-bit
> version of it, along with the relevant objtool changes (though it may
> still be a few weeks before I get the chance).

Sounds good to me, thanks!

Ingo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-06 16:59    [W:0.109 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site