Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Date | Thu, 5 Jul 2018 01:19:04 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind |
| |
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > On 7/4/2018 4:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:16:20 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> >>> Adding Ulf and Marek. >>> >>> On 6/27/2018 6:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>>> >>>> Add a flag to autoremove the device links on supplier driver >>>> unbind. This obviates the need to explicitly delete the link >>>> in the remove path. >>>> We remove these links only when the supplier's link to its >>>> consumers has gone to DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND state. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> >>>> Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> >>>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> >>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >>>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >>>> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org >>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >>>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >>>> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org >>>> --- >>> >>> Hi Rafael, et al. >>> >>> Gentle ping. >>> Do you have comments on this series. I would really like to conclude >>> these >>> device link additions sooner, and get things moving on the long awaited >>> arm-smmu clock/runtime support series. >>> >>> Thanks again for reviewing these patches. >> >> They are fine by me. >> >> I can queue them up for 4.19 if no one has objections (Greg in >> particular). > > > Hi Rafael, > > I will resubmit these 2 patches as part of the arm-smmu series, as one > of the patch in the series depends on addition of > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER. > So these 2 patches and arm-smmu series should go together. > Can you please consider givnig your Ack?
I would prefer to apply them myself to be honest and put them on an public git branch for you to pull from.
Thanks, Rafael
| |