Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V10] powercap/drivers/idle_inject: Add an idle injection framework | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Date | Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:57:29 +0200 |
| |
On 04/07/2018 12:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:01:05 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 26-06-18, 12:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> Initially, the cpu_cooling device for ARM was changed by adding a new >>> policy inserting idle cycles. The intel_powerclamp driver does a >>> similar action. >>> >>> Instead of implementing idle injections privately in the cpu_cooling >>> device, move the idle injection code in a dedicated framework and give >>> the opportunity to other frameworks to make use of it. >>> >>> The framework relies on the smpboot kthreads which handles via its >>> main loop the common code for hotplugging and [un]parking. >>> >>> This code was previously tested with the cpu cooling device and went >>> through several iterations. It results now in split code and API >>> exported in the header file. It was tested with the cpu cooling device >>> with success. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org> >>> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com> >>> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> >>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> >>> Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> >>> --- >>> >>> V10: >>> - Remove set_freezable (Rafael J. Wysocki) >>> - Reduce the prefixed names 'injection' by 'inject" (Rafael J. Wysocki) >>> - Rename 'idle_injection_wakeup_fn()' to 'idle_inject_timer_fn()' (Rafael J. Wysocki) >>> - Shorten label 'out_rollback_per_cpu' to 'out_rollback' (Rafael J. Wysocki) >> >> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > I've applied the patch, but I've rewrittent all of the comments in it. > > Daniel, please check the result in linux-next and let me know if you see any > problems.
I went through the comments and I don't see any problems. Thanks for taking care of making them more clear.
-- Daniel
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |