lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] ACPI: bus: match of_device_id using acpi device
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Nikolaus Voss
> <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
>>>> <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
>>> +1 on NACK for this and anything else that abuse PRP0001 as a short cut
>>> approach.
>> This is no abuse but exactly what PRP0001 is meant for. The basic idea of
>> PRP0001 is to reuse DT "compatible" strings in ACPI namespace, see
>> Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt. Reusing also means getting access to the
>> of_device_id.
>
> The idea was for almost DIY and / or manufacturer to develop a
> prototype without modifying match code and faking ACPI IDs.
> That's why the target of PRP0001 is almost sensors connected to I2C and SPI.
>
> That's why I agreed on your patch to help with this. But! The proper
> solution for the devices (device manufacturer) is to allocate an ACPI
> ID and provide a corresponding table to the driver.
>
> This is my understanding of that exercise. Rafael can correct me.

You are right.

>> Allocating an ACPI id for an already existing DT driver is redundant, isn't
>> it?
>
> It is not.

Again, right.

Thanks,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-04 12:28    [W:0.037 / U:4.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site