lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: Make lazy TLB mode lazier
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:33:02AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The tlb flush code first increments mm->context.tlb_gen, and then sends

> shootdown IPIs to CPUs that have this mm loaded and are not in lazy
> TLB mode.
>
> At context switch time, we have to ensure that we check the tlb_gen after
> we load the old is_lazy state.
>
> Maybe something like this?
>
> /*
> * Read the tlb_gen to check whether a flush is needed.
> * If the TLB is up to date, just use it.
> * The TLB shootdown code first increments tlb_gen, and then
> * sends IPIs to CPUs that have this CPU loaded and are not
> * in lazy TLB mode. The barrier ensures we handle
> * cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy before tlb_gen, keeping this code
> * synchronized with the TLB flush code.
> */

Let me try and draw a diagram; that always works better for me that
text. So the relevant ordering is something like:

CPU0 - switch_mm() CPU1 - flush_tlb_mm_range()

[W] cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy = false; [RmW] next->tlb_gen++
smp_mb() MB (implied)
[R] tlb_gen = next->tlb_gen native_flush_tlb_others()
[R] cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy


Such that CPU1 either observes !lazy and flushes and/or CPU0 observes
the generation increment and forces a flush itself.

Either way, CPU0 gets flushed.


Also, I don't suppose you've looked at the paravirt instances of
flush_tlb_other() ? They don't elide the flushes because of lazy.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-18 18:01    [W:2.656 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site