Messages in this thread | | | From | Pavel Tatashin <> | Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:33:36 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v14 08/25] x86/kvmclock: Avoid TSC recalibration |
| |
Thank you Paolo for letting me know. I will remove this patch from the series, or it can be removed by whomever adds the series.
Thank you, Pavel On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:14 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 18/07/2018 04:21, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > > > If the host gives us a TSC rate, assume it is good and don't try and > > recalibrate things against virtual timer hardware. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 11 ++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c > > index ed170171fe49..da0ede8ac8f6 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c > > @@ -141,7 +141,16 @@ static inline void kvm_sched_clock_init(bool stable) > > */ > > static unsigned long kvm_get_tsc_khz(void) > > { > > - return pvclock_tsc_khz(this_cpu_pvti()); > > + unsigned long tsc_khz = pvclock_tsc_khz(this_cpu_pvti()); > > + > > + /* > > + * TSC frequency is reported by the host; calibration against (virtual) > > + * HPET/PM-timer in a guest is dodgy and pointless since the host > > + * already did it for us where required. > > + */ > > + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ); > > + > > + return tsc_khz; > > } > > > > static void kvm_get_preset_lpj(void) > > > > This patch (really a similar one) has just been sent to Linus. > > Paolo
| |