Messages in this thread | | | From | Jonathan Maxwell <> | Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:57:33 +1000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: improve setsockopt() TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accuracy |
| |
Okay I see what you mean looking some examples on:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
I'll resubmit with the correct patch series numbers but with the same detailed description.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 07/17/2018 06:55 PM, Jonathan Maxwell wrote: >> After committing the patches in my net-next git branch I used git send-mail: >> >> git send-email --identity=XXX --cover-letter --annotate origin >> --compose --signoff >> >> and manually updated it based on an example of yours: >> >> https://lwn.net/Articles/706491/ >> >> I can see the 3 patches that I just submitted on: >> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ >> >> Flagged as under review by DaveM. >> > > I dunno, each patch belongs to a separate patch series, this is not expected. > > Compare to what happens on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ for a proper submission. > > If you click on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=56100 for example, > you can see 5 patch in a series. > > Standard workflow : > > git-format-patch ... > > <edit cover letter> > > git send-email --to "David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>" \ > --cc "netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>" \ > --cc "Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>" \ > 00*
| |