Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes | From | Vlastimil Babka <> | Date | Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:11:22 +0200 |
| |
On 07/17/2018 08:54 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> >>> If these per-cpu data is something like per-cpu refcounters, >>> which are using to manage reclaimable objects (e.g. cgroup css objects). >>> Of course, they are not always reclaimable, but in certain states. >> >> BTW, seems you seem interested, could you provide some more formal >> review as well? Others too. We don't need to cover all use cases >> immediately, when the patchset is apparently stalled due to lack of >> review. Thanks! > > Sure!
Thanks!
> The patchset looks sane at a first glance, but I need some time > to dig deeper. Is v2 the final version?
There was a fixlet on top and some added changelog text, so I'll do a v3 tomorrow incorporating that to make things easier for everyone.
> Thanks! >
| |