Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions? | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:55:03 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 10:28 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 07/16/2018 09:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote: > > > At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom > > > family is > > > omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit > > > fec9434a12f3 > > > to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a > > > patch > > > adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome? > > > > Probably. Dave? > > IIRC, Alan Cox was compiling a list on what is affected vs. not. He > would know way better than I.
The pre Silvermont atom cores are in order. When I did the original list I didn't bother with all the 32bit cores as we didn't have any 32bit mitigations then.
Alan
| |