lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf: btf: print bpftool map data with btf
From
Date
On 07/13/2018 11:35 PM, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 07/12/2018 05:30 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:08:03 -0700, Okash Khawaja wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Here are the changes from v4:
>>>>
>>>> patch 2:
>>>>
>>>> - sort headers in btf_dumper.c
>>>> - remove extra parentheses
>>>> - include asm/byteorder.h
>>>> - compile error when big and small endian bitfields macro undefined
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
>>
>> Hmm, strange, by accident I just noticed that only your bpf fix ever made
>> it to patchwork, Okash.
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_netdev_list_-3Fsubmitter-3D74458-26state-3D-2A&d=DwICaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=4wHrS7MHHFLZe_WCJwRVhA&m=wkiBQFYWPyiN9WONHLY0WiZxcOwNRhXaMMLIE551mCA&s=RggQzClRdkwawboGLPgPXHOdUtYffxeOwlcBlFru-P4&e=
>>
>> Potentially because you've sent with attachments which got dropped on
>> the list?
> interesting because i send all patches using quilt mail, the same way i
> sent bpf fix. i can try git-send-email.
>
> also i dropped Acked-by as i changed patch versions. is it common thing
> to do? or should i keep the Acked-by?

Depends on whether the pieces that have been ACKed changed in the
meantime or not.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-15 22:07    [W:0.063 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site