Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:28:04 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET |
| |
> > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > > not to CFE? > > > > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. > > Or something like that.
Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"?
Pavel
(*) Three letter accronyms. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |