lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET

    * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

    >
    > > > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"),
    > > > > not to CFE?
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out.
    > >
    > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal
    > > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET
    > > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference.
    > >
    > > Or something like that.
    >
    > Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number
    > of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"?

    Erm, I wanted to say 'CFE', i.e. the abbreviation of 'Control Flow Enforcement'.

    But I guess I can live with CET as well ...

    Thanks,

    Ingo
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-07-15 22:06    [W:2.423 / U:0.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site