lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] module: exclude SHN_UNDEF symbols from kallsyms api
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [04/06/18 08:16 -0500]:
>On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> +++ Jessica Yu [04/06/18 11:54 +0200]:
>> > +++ Jessica Yu [04/06/18 10:05 +0200]:
>> > > +++ Josh Poimboeuf [02/06/18 12:32 -0500]:
>> > > > Hi Jessica,
>> > > >
>> > > > I found a bug:
>> > > >
>> > > > [root@f25 ~]# modprobe livepatch-sample
>> > > > [root@f25 ~]# grep ' u ' /proc/kallsyms
>> > > > ffffffff81161080 u klp_enable_patch [livepatch_sample]
>> > > > ffffffff81a01800 u __fentry__ [livepatch_sample]
>> > > > ffffffff81161250 u klp_unregister_patch [livepatch_sample]
>> > > > ffffffff81161870 u klp_register_patch [livepatch_sample]
>> > > > ffffffff8131f0b0 u seq_printf [livepatch_sample]
>> > > >
>> > > > Notice that livepatch modules' undefined symbols are showing up in
>> > > > /proc/kallsyms. This can confuse klp_find_object_symbol() which can
>> > > > cause subtle bugs in livepatch.
>> > > >
>> > > > I stared at the module kallsyms code for a bit, but I don't see the bug.
>> > > > Maybe it has something to do with how we save the symbol table in
>> > > > copy_module_elf(). Any ideas?
>> > >
>> > > Hi Josh!
>> > >
>> > > This is because we preserve the entire symbol table for livepatch
>> > > modules, including the SHN_UNDEF symbols. IIRC, this is so that we can
>> > > still apply relocations properly with apply_relocate_add() after a
>> > > to-be-patched object is loaded. Normally we don't save these SHN_UNDEF
>> > > symbols for modules so they do not appear in /proc/kallsyms.
>> >
>> > Hm, if having the full symtab in kallsyms is causing trouble, one
>> > possibility would be to just have the module kallsyms code simply
>> > skip/ignore undef symbols. That's what we technically do for normal
>> > modules anyway (we normally cut undef syms out of the symtab). Haven't
>> > tested this idea but does that sound like it'd help?
>>
>> See if the following patch (untested) helps. It does not fix the
>> /proc/kallsyms lookup, that requires a separate patch. But it should
>> exclude the undef symbols from module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol() and
>> thus also from klp_find_object_symbol().
>
>That seems like it would work. But wouldn't it be more robust if we
>don't store the SHN_UNDEF symbols to start with? Really it's only the
>SHN_LIVEPATCH symbols that we need to keep, right?

Hm, didn't we have a reason for preserving the original symbol tables?
It's not that we're storing the undef symbols on purpose, it's just
that in the case of a livepatch module we keep *all* the symbols.
IIRC, the original reasoning was that we needed to keep the original
symtab indices in place, otherwise apply_relocate() (which uses the
original symbol index encoded in the relocation) won't work.
Selectively copying only SHN_LIVEPATCH symbols when building the
module's symbol table will unfortunately mess the symbol indices up :/
Under these restrictions, it just seemed easier to make kallsyms
ignore undef symbols.

>What do you think about the following (untested)?
>
>diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>index c9bea7f2b43e..78ec9de856e3 100644
>--- a/kernel/module.c
>+++ b/kernel/module.c
>@@ -2586,6 +2586,9 @@ static bool is_core_symbol(const Elf_Sym *src, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
> {
> const Elf_Shdr *sec;
>
>+ if (src->st_shndx == SHN_LIVEPATCH)
>+ return true;
>+
> if (src->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF
> || src->st_shndx >= shnum
> || !src->st_name)
>@@ -2632,9 +2635,9 @@ static void layout_symtab(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
>
> /* Compute total space required for the core symbols' strtab. */
> for (ndst = i = 0; i < nsrc; i++) {
>- if (i == 0 || is_livepatch_module(mod) ||
>- is_core_symbol(src+i, info->sechdrs, info->hdr->e_shnum,
>- info->index.pcpu)) {
>+ if (i == 0 || is_core_symbol(src+i, info->sechdrs,
>+ info->hdr->e_shnum,
>+ info->index.pcpu)) {
> strtab_size += strlen(&info->strtab[src[i].st_name])+1;
> ndst++;
> }
>@@ -2691,9 +2694,9 @@ static void add_kallsyms(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
> mod->core_kallsyms.strtab = s = mod->core_layout.base + info->stroffs;
> src = mod->kallsyms->symtab;
> for (ndst = i = 0; i < mod->kallsyms->num_symtab; i++) {
>- if (i == 0 || is_livepatch_module(mod) ||
>- is_core_symbol(src+i, info->sechdrs, info->hdr->e_shnum,
>- info->index.pcpu)) {
>+ if (i == 0 || is_core_symbol(src+i, info->sechdrs,
>+ info->hdr->e_shnum,
>+ info->index.pcpu)) {
> dst[ndst] = src[i];
> dst[ndst++].st_name = s - mod->core_kallsyms.strtab;
> s += strlcpy(s, &mod->kallsyms->strtab[src[i].st_name],

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-04 16:06    [W:0.048 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site