Messages in this thread | | | From | Souptick Joarder <> | Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:37:37 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: drm: armada: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t |
| |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:42:15AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> >>> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: >> >>>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:34:48PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: >> >>>>> Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler in >> >>>>> struct vm_operations_struct. For now, this is just >> >>>>> documenting that the function returns a VM_FAULT >> >>>>> value rather than an errno. Once all instances are >> >>>>> converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> commit 1c8f422059ae ("mm: change return type to vm_fault_t") >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Previously vm_insert_pfn() returns err which driver >> >>>>> mapped into VM_FAULT_* type. The new function >> >>>>> vmf_insert_pfn() will replace this inefficiency by >> >>>>> returning VM_FAULT_* type. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> >> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> >> >>>> >> >>>> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks. >> >>> >> >>> If no further comment, we would like to get this patch in queue >> >>> for 4.18. >> >> >> >> We would like to get this patch in queue >> >> for 4.18. >> > >> > We would like to get this patch in 4.18. >> >> Russell, This patch is not merged in 4.18-rc-1. > > Correct, I wasn't able to add it to my tree because David Airlie hadn't > pulled the previous merge request, so it missed the 4.18 merge window. > > The reason for me acking the patch was so that /someone else/ could > pick it up instead, and that obviously also didn't happen - maybe the > drm-misc tree was closed for new work at the point you sent the patch. > > I've picked this patch up now, thanks. >
Thanks. Queued for 4.19 merge window ?
| |