lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86-64: use 32-bit XOR to zero registers
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.06.18 at 18:33, <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On 06/25/2018 03:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Some Intel CPUs don't recognize 64-bit XORs as zeroing idioms - use
> >> 32-bit ones instead.
> >
> > Hmph. Is that considered a bug (errata)?
>
> No.
>
> > URL/references?
>
> Intel's Optimization Reference Manual says so (in rev 040 this is in section
> 16.2.2.5 "Zeroing Idioms" as a subsection of the Goldmont/Silvermont
> descriptions).
>
> > Are these changes really only zeroing the lower 32 bits of the register?
> > and that's all that the code cares about?
>
> No - like all operations targeting a 32-bit register, the result is zero
> extended to the entire 64-bit destination register.

Missing information that would have been helpful in the commit message:

When the processor can recognize something as a zeroing idiom, it
optimizes that operation on the front-end. Only 32-bit XOR r,r is
documented as a zeroing idiom according to the Intel optimization
manual. While a few Intel processors recognize the 64-bit version of
XOR r,r as a zeroing idiom, many won't.

Note that the 32-bit operation extends to the high part of the 64-bit
register, so it will zero the entire 64-bit register. The 32-bit
instruction is also one byte shorter.

The last sentence is just a reminder, for completeness...

--
Henrique Holschuh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-26 13:38    [W:0.372 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site