lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: rseq: Implement backend rseq calls and select HAVE_RSEQ
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:54:43PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> /*
> * Please add new compat syscalls above this comment and update
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 28ad8799406f..1eda9e1a1f4a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -904,6 +904,7 @@ ENDPROC(el0_error)
> ret_fast_syscall:
> disable_daif
> str x0, [sp, #S_X0] // returned x0
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
> ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // re-check for syscall tracing
> and x2, x1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK
> cbnz x2, ret_fast_syscall_trace
> @@ -911,6 +912,7 @@ ret_fast_syscall:
> cbnz x2, work_pending
> enable_step_tsk x1, x2
> kernel_exit 0
> +#endif
> ret_fast_syscall_trace:
> enable_daif
> b __sys_trace_return_skipped // we already saved x0

I *think* this is ok, since we re-check the TIF bits in
syscall_trace_exit().

This does mean that we'd now always call audit_syscall_exit(),
regardless of TIF_AUDIT, but there are already cases when we call that
with TIF_AUDIT clear, so I think if that's a problem it's a latent bug.
Likewise for audit_syscall_entry().

It seems we're in the same boat as other architectures there,
regardless.

FWIW, for the entry bits:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-26 12:31    [W:0.067 / U:0.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site