lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: ACPI support in common clock framework
Date
Quoting Sudeep Holla (2018-06-25 10:15:45)
>
>
> On 25/06/18 17:37, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2018-06-16 08:50:18)
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is this for clk_enable/disable? What about clk_set_rate() or
> >>> clk_set_phase()? Is ACPI's AML taking care of that?
> >>
> >> That's for clk_enable/disable AFAICS.
> >>
> >> AML doesn't manage device performance states at all.
> >
> > Alright. We may need to add a better way for device drivers to get
> > handles to clk pointers on ACPI firmware so they can change frequencies
> > or phase, etc.
>
> Is there any specific usecase/device needing this in the kernel ? SPI
> slaves ?

Mark Brown has been pushing x86 folks to use clk framework for audio
drivers in ASoC. I haven't seen other uses besides that really.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-26 01:38    [W:0.042 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site