lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/base: introduce some help routines for reordering a group of dev
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:23:05PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> This patch introduce some help routines used by next patch. It aims to
> ease reviewing, while the next patch will concentrate on algorithm.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 36622b5..8113d2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,44 @@ static int device_is_dependent(struct device *dev, void *target)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +struct pos_info {
> + struct device *pos;
> + struct device *tail;
> +};
> +
> +/* caller takes the devices_kset->list_lock */
> +static int descendants_reorder_after_pos(struct device *dev,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct device *pos;
> + struct pos_info *p = data;
> +
> + pos = p->pos;
> + pr_debug("devices_kset: Moving %s after %s\n",
> + dev_name(dev), dev_name(pos));
> + device_for_each_child(dev, p, descendants_reorder_after_pos);
> + /* children at the tail */
> + list_move(&dev->kobj.entry, &pos->kobj.entry);
> + /* record the right boundary of the section */
> + if (p->tail == NULL)
> + p->tail = dev;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* iterate over an open section */
> +#define list_opensect_for_each_reverse(cur, left, right) \
> + for (cur = right->prev; cur == left; cur = cur->prev)
> +
> +static bool is_consumer(struct device *query, struct device *supplier)
> +{
> + struct device_link *link;
> + /* todo, lock protection */
> + list_for_each_entry(link, &supplier->links.consumers, s_node)
> + if (link->consumer == query)
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}

You are adding code that no one uses yet, making this impossible to
review as I don't know what to expect. I shouldn't have to read the
second patch and have to flip back and forth to try to figure it out :(

sorry, please break this series up in a better way to make it simpler to
review.

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-25 08:42    [W:0.058 / U:1.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site