Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS | From | Andreas Färber <> | Date | Sun, 24 Jun 2018 15:04:21 +0200 |
| |
Hi Mani,
Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam: > Define power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC Smart Power System (SPS). > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt | 2 ++ > include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt > index 78edd63641e8..a3571937b019 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt > @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ Actions Semi Owl Smart Power System (SPS) > Required properties: > - compatible : "actions,s500-sps" for S500 > "actions,s700-sps" for S700 > + "actions,s900-sps" for S900 > - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device. > - #power-domain-cells : Must be 1. > See macros in: > include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s500-powergate.h for S500 > include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s700-powergate.h for S700 > + include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h for S900 > > > Example: > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is supposed to be dual-licensed.
Can you please give your consent to make this
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
like my S500 and S700 bindings?
Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?
Otherwise looks fine, except that I'll need a topic branch (v4.19/s900-sps-bindings) if we want to merge the driver portion at the same time.
Regards, Andreas
> +/* > + * Actions Semi S900 SPS > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd. > + */ > +#ifndef DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H > +#define DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H > + > +#define S900_PD_GPU_B 0 > +#define S900_PD_VCE 1 > +#define S900_PD_SENSOR 2 > +#define S900_PD_VDE 3 > +#define S900_PD_HDE 4 > +#define S900_PD_USB3 5 > +#define S900_PD_DDR0 6 > +#define S900_PD_DDR1 7 > +#define S900_PD_DE 8 > +#define S900_PD_NAND 9 > +#define S900_PD_USB2_H0 10 > +#define S900_PD_USB2_H1 11 > + > +#endif >
-- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
| |