Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation | From | Srinivas Pandruvada <> | Date | Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:14:59 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 00:05 +0000, Xu, Even wrote: > Ok, sure, I will update patch comments and resubmit. Can you also add in the sign-off area
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Thanks, Srinivas
> Thanks Srinivas! > > Best Regards, > Even Xu > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Srinivas Pandruvada [mailto:srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com > ] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:31 PM > To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>; Xu, Even <even.xu@intel.com> > Cc: benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux > -kernel@vger.kernel.org; Xu, Even <even.xu@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm > callbacks to support hibernation > > On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 16:53 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > > > From: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com> > > > > > > Current ish driver only register resume/suspend PM callbacks > > > which > > > don't support hibernation (suspend to disk). Now use the > > > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly. > > > The suspend and resume functions will now be used for both > > > suspend > > > to RAM and hibernation. > > > > > > If power management is disable, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do > > > nothing, > > > the suspend and resume related functions won't be used, so mark > > > them > > > as __maybe_unused to clarify that this is intended behavior, and > > > remove #ifdefs for power management. > > > > This describes details the patch does on code level, but what are > > the > > user observable effects? Hibernation resume doesn't fail any more? > > Hibernation > > is possible (and wasn't before)? Did kernel crash while trying to > > hibernate and this is the fix? Or ... ? > > Even, > Can you add more details and resubmit ASAP? > > Basically after hiberation, the ISH can't resume properly and user > may not see sensor events (for example: screen rotation may not > work). > User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following > message in log: > hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from > ISHTP device > > So this is adding support for S4/hiberbation to ISH. > > > > Thanks, > Srinivas > > > > > Thanks, > >
| |