Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Jun 2018 04:52:45 -0400 | From | Alexei Starovoitov <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree |
| |
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:59:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Thu, 31 May 2018 07:38:55 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:25:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > x86_64-linux-ld: unknown architecture of input file `net/bpfilter/bpfilter_umh.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output > > > > > > Caused by commit > > > > > > d2ba09c17a06 ("net: add skeleton of bpfilter kernel module") > > > > > > In my builds, the host is PowerPC 64 LE ... > > > > > > I have reverted that commit along with > > > > > > 61a552eb487f ("bpfilter: fix build dependency") > > > 13405468f49d ("bpfilter: don't pass O_CREAT when opening console for debug") > > > > > > for today. > > > > I am still getting this failure (well, at least yesterday I did). > > Still happened today. My guess is that bpfilter_umh needs to be built > with the kernel compiler (not the host compiler - since ir is meant to > run on the some machine as the kernel, right?) but will require the > kernel architecture libc etc > > > I replaced the reverts above with the following: > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:33:28 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] net: bpfilter: mark as BROKEN for now > > This does not build in a cross compile environment > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > --- > net/bpfilter/Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/bpfilter/Kconfig b/net/bpfilter/Kconfig > index a948b072c28f..ea4be72fdf6e 100644 > --- a/net/bpfilter/Kconfig > +++ b/net/bpfilter/Kconfig > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ menuconfig BPFILTER > bool "BPF based packet filtering framework (BPFILTER)" > default n > depends on NET && BPF && INET > + depends on BROKEN
yeah. that's another option. Sorry for delay. networking folks are traveling to netconf. The issue is being discussed here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/921597/
Currently we're thinking how to add a check that hostcc's arch is equal to cross-cc target arch and ideally equal to arch of the host where it will be run.
| |