Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 May 2018 14:11:54 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil: remove stale comment |
| |
On 09-05-18, 10:40, Juri Lelli wrote: > After commit 794a56ebd9a57 ("sched/cpufreq: Change the worker kthread to > SCHED_DEADLINE") schedutil kthreads are "ignored" for a clock frequency > selection point of view, so the potential corner case for RT tasks is not > possible at all now. > > Remove the stale comment mentioning it. > > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com> > Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> > --- > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 13 ------------- > 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > index d2c6083304b4..23ef19070137 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -396,19 +396,6 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work) > > sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work); > > - /* > - * For RT tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the frequency to maximum. > - * Special care must be taken to ensure that this kthread doesn't result > - * in the same behavior. > - * > - * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is > - * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that > - * the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests. > - * > - * There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right > - * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are > - * neglected for now. > - */ > kthread_queue_work(&sg_policy->worker, &sg_policy->work); > }
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-- viresh
| |