Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 May 2018 09:53:13 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Remove no longer required irqsave/restore |
| |
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:49:25PM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 May 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:38:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > > > > (Me, I would run rcutorture scenario TREE03 for an extended time period > > > > > > > on b4abf91047cf with your patch applied. > > > > > > > > > > And with lockdep enabled, which TREE03 does not do by default. > > > > > > > > Will run that again to make sure. > > > > > > I ran the rcutorture scenario TREE03 for 4 hours with the above > > > described setup. It was successful and without any lockdep splats. > > > > Thank you for the testing, Anna-Maria! If you give them a Tested-by, > > I will give them an ack. ;-) > > > > If it is ok to give a Tested-by to the patch I wrote, I will do this > to get your ack :) > > Tested-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
It wasn't even all that early in the morning for me, was it? ;-) Anyway:
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I am sure that you have already considered adding your test results to the commit log as an alternative to applying a Tested-by to your own patch.
Thanx, Paul
| |