Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 31 May 2018 05:31:04 -0700 | From | tip-bot for Kan Liang <> | Subject | [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code |
| |
Commit-ID: 4749f8196452eeb73cf2086a6a9705bae479d33d Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4749f8196452eeb73cf2086a6a9705bae479d33d Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 3 May 2018 11:25:08 -0700 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Thu, 31 May 2018 12:36:28 +0200
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code
There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only exception is client IMC uncore, which has been specially handled. For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter. The code quality issue will bring problem when a new counter index is introduced.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: acme@kernel.org Cc: eranian@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525371913-10597-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c index a7956fc7ca1d..3b0f93eb3cc0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *e u64 prev_count, new_count, delta; int shift; - if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED) + if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED) shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box); else shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);
| |