Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 May 2018 11:13:33 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings |
| |
On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote: > Hello Rob, Viresh, > > Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes > should look something like the below. > > Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu > nodes.
Well Rob said Yes to that I think.
> Please suggest if my understanding is wrong. > > cpu@0 { > qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>; > … > }; > > same follows for cpu 1/2/3 > > cpu@400 { > qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>; > … > }; > same follows for cpu 5/6/7 > > freq_domain_table0 : freq_table { > reg = < >, < >, < > ; > reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base"; > }; > > freq_domain_table1 : freq_table { > reg = < >, < >, < > ; > reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base"; > };
Mostly yes.
-- viresh
| |