Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 May 2018 11:24:30 +0200 | From | Antoine Tenart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: sfp: small improvements |
| |
Hi David,
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:51:15AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> > Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:29:05 +0200 > > > This series was part of the mvpp2 phylink one but as we reworked it to > > use fixed-link on the DB boards, the SFP commits weren't needed > > anymore for our use case. Two of the three patches still are needed I > > believe (I ditched the one about non-wired SFP cages), so they are sent > > here in a separate series. > > Based upon the discussion of patch #1, it seems there is a desire to make > the i2c-bus property mandatory since it isn't clear if access to the SFP > module without it really all that doable.
Thanks for the clarification, I was about to ask for it. I'll make a v2 making i2c-bus mandatory then.
Thanks! Antoine
-- Antoine Ténart, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
| |