lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] watchdog: sp805: set WDOG_HW_RUNNING when appropriate
From
Date
Hi Guenter,

On 5/22/2018 1:54 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:47:18AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>> If the watchdog hardware is already enabled during the boot process,
>> when the Linux watchdog driver loads, it should reset the watchdog and
>> tell the watchdog framework. As a result, ping can be generated from
>> the watchdog framework, until the userspace watchdog daemon takes over
>> control
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>> index 1484609..408ffbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> /* control register masks */
>> #define INT_ENABLE (1 << 0)
>> #define RESET_ENABLE (1 << 1)
>> + #define ENABLE_MASK (INT_ENABLE | RESET_ENABLE)
>> #define WDTINTCLR 0x00C
>> #define WDTRIS 0x010
>> #define WDTMIS 0x014
>> @@ -74,6 +75,18 @@ module_param(nowayout, bool, 0);
>> MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout,
>> "Set to 1 to keep watchdog running after device release");
>>
>> +/* returns true if wdt is running; otherwise returns false */
>> +static bool wdt_is_running(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>> +{
>> + struct sp805_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>> +
>> + if ((readl_relaxed(wdt->base + WDTCONTROL) & ENABLE_MASK) ==
>> + ENABLE_MASK)
>> + return true;
>> + else
>> + return false;
>
> return !!(readl_relaxed(wdt->base + WDTCONTROL) & ENABLE_MASK));
>

Note ENABLE_MASK contains two bits (INT_ENABLE and RESET_ENABLE);
therefore, a simple !!(expression) would not work? That is, the masked
result needs to be compared against the mask again to ensure both bits
are set, right?

Thanks,

Ray

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-23 01:24    [W:0.097 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site