Messages in this thread | | | From | Adam Manzanares <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: add RWF_IOPRIO | Date | Wed, 2 May 2018 17:51:25 +0000 |
| |
On 5/2/18 10:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:57:39AM -0700, adam.manzanares@wdc.com wrote: >> From: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com> >> >> This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call. >> >> When the RWF_IOPRIO flag is set then the aio_reqprio field of the iocb >> is interpreted as an I/O scheduling class and priority. > > I think this belongs into the IOCB_FLAG_* flags namespace for aio_flags > field as it isn't a field valid for plain read/write. > > Also you probably want to merge both patches as they only really > make sense together. >
I will make the changes and send out a v2.
| |