Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 15 May 2018 00:50:57 +0300 | From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: Introduce 'no5lvl' kernel parameter |
| |
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:55:00PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c > > @@ -1008,6 +1008,12 @@ static void __init early_identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > > */ > > setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PCID); > > #endif > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL > > + /* Clear the 5-level paging feature if user asked for 'no5lvl' */ > > no5lvl is only one reason why 5 level paging is not available.
The 5-level paging may not be available for few reasons: - CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=n - Machine doesn't support X86_FEATURE_LA57 -- clearing is nop; - User asked for 'no5lvl'.
To me the one-line comment reflects the situation reasonably well.
Do you want more verbose comment here? > > + if (!__pgtable_l5_enabled) > > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57); > > +#endif > > And that #ifdeffery can be avoided by simply doing: > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL) && !pgtable_l5_enabled) > setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57); > > Hmm?
Unfortunately, no.
pgtable_l5_enabled is defined as cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57). So with such change we would only clear the feature bit if it's already clear.
-- Kirill A. Shutemov
| |